It is only as our kids get a little older, as the stuff that they desire extends beyond the teething rings and cloth books that we joyfully provided, that their desire for stuff becomes problematic. Then, their desire is suddenly attached to money and space. As experienced acquirers of stuff, we parents see very clearly the money-and-space pitfalls of the bottomless pit that our kids' desires seem to encompass.
We know something they don't know.
That is such a tricky spot to be in! Indeed, it is the crux of most conflicts between parent and child. They want X, and we know that X will lead to undesirable consequences 1, 2, and 3. We know, for crying out loud! We know! Are we supposed to just stand by and let them blunder their way into those consequences?! Are we supposed to just stand by and allow them to drag us into those consequences with them?!
Yep.
We can certainly offer our perspective. We can share our experience. We can warn. But as unschoolers, as thinking parents, as people who believe that kids are people, we simply don't get to pull out the "I'm the parent and I know best" card.
I know what you're thinking: Why didn't I take the blue pill? Heh. Too late now, sorry!
When it comes to the acquisition of stuff, standing by while your kids choose means two things:
One: Your kids will make purchases that you do not agree with.
Two: You will have to live with that.
Both of these are easier to navigate with a stuff-and-money-and-space system in place. The system needs to reflect your lifestyle and income, and it needs to evolve as the kids get older and as other cirumstances change.
Here's our system:
Stuff - The kids choose. Period.
When they were young, I used to do a lot of coaching about choices. "If you buy that, you won't be able to buy this." This coaching may or may not have been helpful for a while, but they both quickly reached the point where it was bugging the hell out of them. "You take all the fun out of it!" they told me. Oops.
Money - We give our kids a weekly no-strings allowance.
The amount has varied over the years, and there have been lean stretches where we were all going without spending money. Right now, they're getting $15 per week.
When they were little, this allowance was a lifesaver. It completely removed me from the "Can I have this? Can I have that?" mom-as-bad-guy cycle.
Now that they're teenagers... Guess what? $15 per week is not really enough money. They have things they want to buy and experiences they want to have that will take more. Frank and I will help as much as we can, but my kids know that they will have to work to earn the more. They are making plans accordingly.
I want to be crystal clear on this: I have said "Yes" to my kids for years. I have "indulged" them in virtually everything. I have simply handed over as much money as we could afford every week for longer than we've been unschooling. I have made it clear to them that we will continue to support them beyond age 18 if they want us to. And even so, my kids are developing financial independence even as we speak. There's been a really interesting shift in the way they manage money over the last year or two that is worth its own blog post.
For now, I'll just say that people who think kids won't learn the value of money unless there are chores-strings on their allowances are just wrong.
Benefits of the no-strings allowance:
* Practice
* Built-in math
* Independence
* Experience
It's gold. And it doesn't have to cost you any more than you already spend.
Space - Where do we put everything?
There are a couple of myths about space. It helps if you reject these.
- Myth #1: More space or better organization would make everything easier. We have a three-bedroom, two-and-a-half story house with a lot of storage space. We've acquired a lot of storage containers over the years. Frank has built several bookcases. Stuff can still be an issue. No matter how much room you have, it tends to fill up, and you will periodically need to make adjustments. Over the years, we've rearranged rooms, swapped rooms, and tried a bunch of different stuff-management schemes. It's ongoing.
- Myth #2: Kids' stuff should fit into their bedrooms. This belief is a relic of traditional parenting. Toss it out! If each member of the family gets equal space in the house, who is really taking up more than his or her share? It's usually not the kids.
- Myth #3: If you had less stuff, the house would be tidier. We're unschoolers. We live here. We're home a lot. You can tell.
- Myth #4: Your kids will share your values about stuff and money. MJ spends a good portion of her money on clothes. Chloe has a sizable savings account. I cannot say either of those things about myself. Our values—and the stuff we value—are different. Simplicity and frugality may not ever describe your child. That's okay. Love the kid you have. Accept the kid you have.
- Myth #5: It's going to be like this forever. Once upon a time, we probably had 250 cubic feet of Barbie stuff in our house. I kid you not. Now? Barbie occupies less than one cubic foot. Every single Barbie item that has left our house has done so not only with my daughters' permission but with their blessing. We have made several other little girls very happy over the last several years.
I am so glad to be able to say those things, so glad that we embraced (or at least tolerated) and made room for the Barbie collection until they were done with it.
And there's a pang, too. Did I appreciate my little Barbie-playing girls enough while they were here? I don't think I did. I don't think I really knew how fleeting those moments were going to be.
Whatever stuff your child is acquiring now, she will eventually be done with it. Probably. But even if she's never done with it, storing it will eventually be her problem. :-)











6 comments:
oh yeah :) I remember when Kyra was buying every Bratz she could get her hands on.. ((me stopping my thoughts of.."don't you have enough of those??")) She loved those Bratz so much and I actually miss them now. She gave the majority of them to some younger friends. It is fleeting. I remember thinking that, but I really didn't know the magnitude of the fleetingness *G*
I like this post a lot, Ronnie. I remember one of my earliest "doh!" moments about stuff & space was when I realized it was silly to expect my (then toddler) daughter to contain "her stuff" in "her room" while my stuff got to take up the rest of "our house." Now she's 14, and our whole house is "us."
Ronnie, you are on a roll. I completely agree, but two points in your post particularly hit home. The first is about the strings-free allowance - not only the fact that is is not tied to "chores", but also that they can do with it what they want. I still find myself trying to "help" them make good choices with their money, but this reminds me to be a bit more mindful. the second is about sharing space in the house as a family; we do that fairly well, but I still say "my/mine" a bit too often for all of our tastes, I'm sure. Well written, well thought through - thanks!
This is so timely!
I've always been wary of stuff (probably that has something to do with moving 29 times thus far in my life)... and I'm organized up to my eyebrows. But stuff is where it's at these days at my house (especially Lego stuff, which is a bear to tame). I realize I've been dragging my feet in terms of supporting my son's desire to purchase what he wants (as I have visions of been buried alive in small, hard plastic bricks), so this post was a much needed kick in the behind.
:)
We never gave an allowance, in part, because we didn't have a consistent enough income ourselves. It seemed sad at the time that a few bucks a week for each of our four kids could be a deal-breaker for our budget. But as the kids got older the wonderful benefits of the no-allowance lifestyle became apparent. Probably would have turned out just as fantastically WITH an allowance, but that's my story.
We don't pay for chores, we don't give an allowance---our children learned to save money they got from birthday and holiday gifts as well as money paid for small jobs from an uncle who doled out a dollar or two for eager five-year-olds. It helped them learn the all important delayed gratification. And because we don't (due to necessity as well as personal philosophy) buy much of anything but necessities, they also really grasp the deeper meaning of value. (Of course we conver activity fees and educational expenses----not a luxury item IMO). Anyway, two of my kids are now adults. They are calm, frugal and fascinating people who know that fun can't be purchased. They never felt deprived (well, okay, except for video games).
Question. Your. Assumptions.
- Is the ability to delay gratification important to learn?
- Is that ability only learned by being short of funds?
- Are kids who receive an allowance never short of funds? (Reread my post!)
- What is the deeper meaning of value, and is there only one way to learn it?
- Can the frugality that your children exhibit be attributed to their upbringing? (Reread my post - I have a daughter who saves most of her income.)
- Is the frugality that your children exhibit necessarily a permanent condition?
- Is a sense of calm necessarily related to money attitudes?
- Can money buy fun?
Post a Comment